Former world No.1 explains why Alcaraz and Sinner are better than Djokovic, Federer and Nadal

Mats Wilander during 1985 Roland Garros.
Rivalries have always been the heartbeat of tennis. Whether it was Connors, McEnroe, Vilas, and Borg in the 1970s, Sampras and Agassi in the 1990s, or the iconic “Big Three” of Roger FedererRafael Nadal, and Novak Djokovic in the 2000s and 2010s, these matchups have elevated the sport to new heights.

Today, Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner are emerging as the most influential players on the tour, splitting this year’s four Grand Slam titles between them—Sinner claiming the Australian Open and US Open, and Alcaraz securing Roland Garros and Wimbledon.

Mats Wilander, the former Swedish star who held the World No. 1 ranking for 20 weeks in 1988, is no stranger to excellence. That year, Wilander won three Grand Slam titles (Australian Open, Roland Garros, and the US Open) as part of an impressive haul of seven career majors. His dominance extended to seven consecutive Davis Cup finals during the 1980s.

When asked about the current state of tennis, Wilander couldn’t hide his admiration for Alcaraz and Sinner. “When Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz are at their best, nobody has ever played better tennis than them. I hope Roger, Novak, and Rafa aren’t listening, but in terms of level, when Sinner and Alcaraz are in peak form, no one has ever played better tennis,” Wilander told Eurosport.

While Wilander’s claim is bold, comparing different eras of tennis is always a challenge. Alcaraz and Sinner, despite their immense talent and Grand Slam success, are still at the beginning of their careers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *